Why the US police's ``AI tool that automates the creation of reports'' is criticized

Comments · 14 Views

Why the US police's ``AI tool that automates the creation of reports'' is criticized

 

U.S. police are relying more on high-tech tools than ever before, from artificial intelligence (AI) models to analyze crime patterns to drones to track suspects. And now, AI equipped with OpenAI's GPT-4 can handle one of the menial tasks of police officers: creating records and investigation documents.You can read more about it on interested blog SEOToolsKit.co

 

AXON according to the funkyadjunct, a manufacturer of Taser stun guns used by police and with a market capitalization of 22 billion dollars (approx. 3 trillion Y500 billion yen), announced on April 22nd an AI tool called Draft One. did. The tool automates the creation of investigative documents by transcribing text from video and audio data from officers' body cameras.

 

"Police can review that document to confirm accuracy," Axon CEO Rick Smith told Forbes. Axon claims that the Fort Collins Police Department in Colorado, which conducted an initial test of the tool, reduced the time it takes to complete investigative documents by 82%. "With this tool in place, we can increase the time we spend fighting crime by 25%," Smith said. He also mention in cavalerie.net

 

But police reports are critical evidence used in court cases, and relying on AI, which is known for hallucinating, making things up, and displaying racial bias, is dangerous. Some people claim that.

 

"Police who are neither experts in AI nor experts in recognizing the problems with AI are using these systems to interact with the criminal justice system," said Dave Mars, director of surveillance technology at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). "It's kind of a nightmare to create a document that could affect millions of people."

 

Axon CEO Smith acknowledged the dangers of the tool. “It is said that AI can contain bias, and that is true. If data that treats specific people in a discriminatory manner is used for AI training, it will lead to worsening racial discrimination. That is the main risk.”

Can “hallucinations” and racial bias be eliminated?

Smith said Axon recommends that the tool not be used to document serious incidents, such as police shootings. He says some of the tool's early users are using Draft One only for misdemeanor documents, while other customers are using it to create reports for more serious cases. It is also said to be used. But Axon cannot control how individual police departments use the tool.

Noah Spitzer-Williams, Axon's AI product manager, told Forbes that the company built an AI based on the GPT-4 Turbo model to eliminate racial and other biases, and to create AI products that are true to recorded facts. He said that he had created a report. "The simplest countermeasure is to turn off the creativity feature. As a result, the number of hallucinations and mistakes has been dramatically reduced. All the content generated is based solely on the transcription of the recordings. Axon also conducted experiments to prove that the AI ​​tool is not racially biased. The company used transcriptions of existing data and changed only the racial description of each suspect. For example, they replaced the word "white" with "black" or "Latino" and input it into an AI model, then analyzed the resulting document. In an experiment involving hundreds of samples, Spitzer-Williams said, "we found no statistically significant differences between races."



Reduce administrative work for police officers

In a demo shared with Forbes, Axon revealed the process by which its AI model generates investigative documents from an officer's body camera footage. In the video, officers talk to a passerby named Marcus who says he saw the suspect harassing a family in the park. Marcus said the suspect was wearing a green jacket and was "about the same height as me."

 

The AI ​​then generated a short sentence explaining the situation. "Marcus states that this incident occurred approximately 20 minutes ago and that the suspect was last seen hiding behind a slide in the park," the text reads in part. Ta. Following that text, the AI ​​model pointed out where officers should add information, such as Marcus' height.

 

Spitzer-Williams said Axon's AI tools come with an audit trail that lists every action a user takes, allowing law enforcement to know that documents have been reviewed and verified. Can be confirmed. He added that all data will be stored and processed on Microsoft's cloud server Azure.

Daniel Lynskey, a former Boston police chief who now heads the Boston office of Kroll, the world's largest corporate investigation and risk consulting firm, says that if police are going to use AI to prepare investigative documents, they should be clear. He pointed out that defined policies and procedures will be needed. “The most important thing is that the audit process works,” he says. If such rules are followed, AI could reduce police time on paperwork and put more police officers on the street. He said it would lead to. “The people who keep the public safe are not police officers sitting in their offices filling out papers,” he added.



Criticism of Axon's corporate culture

Meanwhile, Axon's product launch event comes about a year after a series of reports criticized the company's corporate culture. Last August, Reuters reported that former employees of the company were forced to electrocute themselves with Tasers and get company tattoos at company events to show their loyalty to the company. It was reported that he was told that he had been

 

Regarding the report, CEO Smith denied that he was forced to act, saying, ``The things we did that they criticized are generally things we're proud of.'' Since then, our recruitment numbers have increased."

 

Reuters also reported in December last year that much of Axon's founding story was revealed by Smith, now 53, that he founded a technology company for law enforcement after his high school friend was shot and killed. It was also reported that it was a fabricated story. He admitted to Forbes that he was not close to the victim, but claimed he was "acquainted."

 

However, the report has not led to a decline in Axon's stock price, which hit an all-time high of more than $316 in March. In February, the company reported 2023 sales of $1.5 billion and net income of $174 million.

 

Forbes recently reported that cities including Baltimore and Augusta attribute Axon's growth to market monopoly. In a lawsuit filed in early April, they alleged that Axon came to dominate the police body camera market and then unfairly raised prices. Axon counters that the allegations are baseless and should be dismissed.

 

Comments